‘Climate Costs’ Taken From Motorists Pockets?
Wednesday, October 14th, 2009
The UK’s independent advisory committee on climate change have recently published a report that recommends a national road pricing system as well as a significant hike in fuel duty and a separate vehicle excise duty. This is contrary to what a lot of people thought would happen if a road pricing system was proposed because it was argued that if such a plan was introduced the price would be offset by a reduction in fuel duty.
However the committee says
“From a carbon perspective, however, this would result in increased emissions (i.e. fuel consumption and emissions are potentially more responsive to fuel duty than to road pricing). From an emissions perspective, therefore, road pricing should be introduced as a complement to fuel duty rather than a substitute.”
The report also suggest a significant increase in road tax as well saying that higher fuel duties could be a powerful tool in encouraging purchase of lower carbon cars, they say
“A 10% increase in petrol prices through a fuel duty increase could result in a 4% decrease in fuel used per kilometre”
It’s the old chestnut again that seems to be the answer to all climate change problems, buy a new car. They say it will stimulate the economy, provide jobs for car factory’s, get everyone in safe cars and get everyone in cleaner cars. I say it will cause people to go into more debt trying to buy a brand new car (which is the reason we are in this economic mess anyway!) and it will mean more cars get scrapped instead of reused, aka recycling. A word they seem to love everywhere except in the car community, where recycling old cars is a bad thing and you just have to buy a new car. Everyone knows all new cars are made in factory’s of marshmallows and run on the power of dreams alone so obviously don’t cause any pollution.
The report gets even more baffling though because they also suggest a stronger enforcement of speed limits and want to lower the motorway limit to 60 mph, which apparently will help to reduce emissions. So I suppose they have checked that with every car ever made and found the average speed with the lowest emissions was 60 mph? Yeah I highly doubt it. I know for a fact that my car is between gears at 60 mph and is labouring in 5th and revving in 4th so will always be more polluting at 60mph than the limit at the moment, 70 mph. To make things even worse they suggest the use of intelligent speed adaptation devices that would physically enforce these ridiculous speed limits. The term nanny state gets used all over the place now but….
The Committee on Climate Change call themselves an independent advice to Government and if the government take their ludicrous ideas on board, which they would probably do because it would mean more money in their pockets, then the motorist could soon be in for a very hard time.
There are so many questions that this report brings up that I don’t think they have actually thought about. How would the massive rise in costs effect businesses? Both in the company car aspect and the businesses that exist within the motoring world. used car lots would go out of business because everyone would have to buy new, car rental and van hire companies would struggle to cope with having to get whole new fleets that met CO2 guidelines. The overall cost they would be able to hire cars or vans out would suddenly sky rocket and people would not be able to afford it as much therefore meaning, car rental businesses, especially those on a smaller scale would struggle to stay open.
To put it simply pricing people off the road would just result in a massive class divide with the rich still affording to swan around in Range Rover’s ( FYI most of the committee that wrote the report are either privileged Chief Exec types or Lord’s.) Whilst everyone else would struggle to afford a new ‘eco’ car and would either get in debt or be forced to walk everywhere, not to mention people who rely on a car for work would probably lose their jobs as a result of it all. But hey at least that would mean less congestion…

